Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> [ in the service of closing out this thread... ]
>
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
>> Finally, 0003-* is a Valgrind suppression borrowed from my parallel
>> CREATE INDEX patch. It's self-explanatory.
>
> Um, I didn't find it all that self-explanatory. Why wouldn't we want
> to avoid writing undefined data? I think the comment at least needs
> to explain exactly what part of the written data might be uninitialized.
> And I'd put the comment into valgrind.supp, too, not in the commit msg.
>
> Also, the suppression seems far too broad. It would for instance
> block any complaint about a write() invoked via an elog call from
> any function invoked from any LogicalTape* function, no matter
> how far removed.

It seems like a new patch will be provided, so moved to next CF with
"waiting on author".
--
Michael