Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-02-10 00:18:22
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQjj37iF16sDNFg93Fe1cSiDzxggoC4FYMANiqLw-1h1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached first version dedicated language patch (document patch is not yet.)
>
> Thanks for the patch! Will review it.
>
> I think that it's time to write the documentation patch.
>
> Though I've not read the patch yet, I found that your patch
> changed s_s_names so that it rejects non-alphabet character
> like *, according to my simple test. It should accept any
> application_name which we can use.

Cool. Planning to look at it as well. Could you as well submit a
regression test based on the recovery infrastructure and submit it as
a separate patch? There is a version upthread of such a test but it
would be good to extract it properly.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-10 00:24:18 Re: Tracing down buildfarm "postmaster does not shut down" failures
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-02-10 00:06:52 Re: Tracing down buildfarm "postmaster does not shut down" failures