Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2017-08-17 23:16:08
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ-UT9_RNty4sAQDxfxnxV2z4vYfhxbhWKN++ZXPQWAJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I rebased the patch to HEAD. PFA a new version of the patch.
>
>> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
>> initially. Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?
>
> I will, but probably not for a week or so. Going eclipse-chasing.

Good luck:
https://xkcd.com/1876/
And enjoy:
https://xkcd.com/1877/
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2017-08-18 00:43:14 Re: Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-08-17 22:47:23 Re: Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr