Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2017-08-18 02:44:18
Message-ID: 2e3fb8f2-3ea1-0271-2485-450b9c11da40@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/08/18 8:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>> I rebased the patch to HEAD. PFA a new version of the patch.
>>
>>> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
>>> initially. Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?
>>
>> I will, but probably not for a week or so. Going eclipse-chasing.
>
> Good luck:
> https://xkcd.com/1876/
> And enjoy:
> https://xkcd.com/1877/

Enjoy!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-08-18 03:13:20 Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-18 01:33:32 Re: [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery