Re: Correct some doc items due to the REPACK

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct some doc items due to the REPACK
Date: 2026-08-13 14:50:40
Message-ID: CAB-JLwZFLOzd7weRP5Qp+_Be3z2918od6cf7LXiFcEJwcY-WXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qui., 13 de ago. de 2026 às 04:45, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> - In mvcc.sgml, v1 added REPACK to the ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock list in a
> way that made the CONCURRENTLY behavior ambiguous. I changed this to
> say that REPACK also acquires this lock mode, while REPACK CONCURRENTLY
> acquires it only when swapping the table and index files.

Cool, your version is much better than mine.
Only on mvcc.sgml I think mine is better because explains other commands
and both which have CONCURRENTLY option explained only once.

regards
Marcos

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2026-08-13 15:19:08 Re: Logical replication row filter loses unchanged toasted columns
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2026-08-13 14:45:42 Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade: add --initdb option to create the new cluster automatically