Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting
Date: 2022-11-24 04:24:54
Message-ID: CAApHDvrq20Fvizq4JgJ=u=BaSf-j-bWiDtG-up74fzuPEMsbkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 02:27, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 13:04, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > I'd rather see this solved like v4 is doing it.
>
> Please do. No further comments. Thanks for your help

Thanks. I pushed the v4 patch with some minor comment adjustments and
also renamed _hash_pgaddtup()'s new parameter to "appendtup". I felt
that better reflected what the parameter does in that function.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-11-24 04:48:11 Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Previous Message Chris Travers 2022-11-24 04:01:33 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15