Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Date: 2022-08-01 21:58:16
Message-ID: CAApHDvrFZsy7TdFPQn2Y2AfKiuM1Gz3swH9iJ0FY_EY4n9krVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 19:37, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:59 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > I'd quite like to push this patch early next week, so if anyone else
> > is following along that might have any objections, could they do so
> > before then?
>
> I have no more comments.

Thank you both for the reviews.

I've now pushed this.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-01 22:03:19 Re: Can postgres ever delete the recycled future WAL files to free-up disk space if max_wal_size is reduced or wal_recycle is set to off?
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-01 21:51:48 Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)