Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause.

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sergei Glukhov <s(dot)glukhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause.
Date: 2023-10-11 09:19:37
Message-ID: CAApHDvovhSB8WkhZt9Y75w7+qvemXufkd4MvbNHf9jwjn3M9sw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 22:09, Sergei Glukhov <s(dot)glukhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this!
>
> I verified that issues are fixed.

Thanks for having a look.

Unfortunately, I'd not long sent the last email and realised that the
step_lastkeyno parameter is now unused and can just be removed from
both get_steps_using_prefix() and get_steps_using_prefix_recurse().
This requires some comment rewriting so I've attempted to do that too
in the attached updated version.

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_get_steps_using_prefix_recurse_v2.patch text/plain 28.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2023-10-11 09:31:43 Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-10-11 09:11:15 Re: Add null termination to string received in parallel apply worker