Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)

From: Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Date: 2023-10-11 09:31:43
Message-ID: 5716086.DvuYhMxLoT@aivenlaptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le mercredi 11 octobre 2023, 10:59:50 CEST Thomas Munro a écrit :
> The back-patch to 12 was a little trickier than anticipated, but after
> taking a break and trying again I now have PG 12...17 patches that
> I've tested against LLVM 10...18 (that's 54 combinations), in every
> case only with the clang corresponding to LLVM.

Thank you Thomas for those patches, and the extensive testing, I will run my
own and let you know.

> I've attached only the patches for master, but the 12-16 versions are
> available at https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/llvm16-$N in
> case anyone has comments on those.

For PG13 and PG12, it looks like the ExecEvalBoolSubroutineTemplate is not
used anywhere, as ExecEvalBoolSubroutine was introduced in PG14 if I'm not
mistaken.

Best regards,

--
Ronan Dunklau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Glukhov 2023-10-11 09:59:37 Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause.
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-10-11 09:19:37 Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause.