Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

From: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date: 2020-01-21 15:03:31
Message-ID: CAAaqYe-Kci9LHaXiQumd7bZcoWn4yMJdft+_Ewtk68NmYL0tng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:58 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 09:37:01AM -0500, James Coleman wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:25 AM Tomas Vondra
> ><tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch has been marked as WoA since end of November, and there has
> >> been no discussion/reviews since then :-( Based on off-list discussion
> >> with James I don't think that's going to change in this CF, so I'll move
> >> it to the next CF.
> >>
> >> I plan to work on the planner part of this patch before 2020-03, with
> >> the hope it can still make it into 13.
> >
> >In that off-list discussion I'd mentioned to Tomas that I would still
> >like to work on this, just my other responsibilities at work have left
> >me little time to work on the most important remaining part of this
> >(the planner parts) since that requires a fair amount of focus and
> >time.
> >
> >That being said, the patch also needs some more work on improving
> >EXPLAIN ANALYZE output (perhaps min/max/mean or median of
> >memory usage number of groups in each sort mode), and I think it's far
> >more feasible that I can tackle that piecemeal before the next CF.
> >
>
> Sure, sorry if that was not clear from my message - you're of course
> more than welcome to continue working on this. My understanding is that
> won't happen by the end of this CF, hence the move to 2020-03.

Oh, yeah, I probably didn't word that reply well -- I just wanted to
add some additional detail to what you had already said.

Thanks for your work on this!

James

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-01-21 15:12:52 Re: Increase psql's password buffer size
Previous Message Sergei Kornilov 2020-01-21 15:03:18 Re: allow online change primary_conninfo