| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
| Date: | 2012-06-28 22:01:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAAZKuFbGMmY0h7q23WyuHQZONH0sG0GLuUEjTD83bOR8D614JQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 28 June 2012 22:22, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> All in all, I don't think this can be a very productive discussion
>> unless someone just pitches a equal or better name overall in terms of
>> conciseness and descriptiveness. I'd rather optimize for those
>> attributes. Old advice is old; that's the nature of the beast.
>
> Robert suggested wal_flush_delay, which does more accurately describe
> what happens now.
Well, I learned something from reading this name, having not followed
the mechanism too closely. I like it.
--
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Urbański | 2012-06-28 22:36:47 | Re: plpython issue with Win64 (PG 9.2) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-28 21:55:24 | Re: embedded list v2 |