| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 16:27:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAASwCXf+kqzQ07ZO5P99FNMvACUfG+BYAvysD7q+PVdCpHv+zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es> wrote:
> We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own
> belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale
> *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying
> they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse
> solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far
> far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards.
So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now
somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting.
Godwin's Law never fails :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-02 16:28:35 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-09-02 16:26:24 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |