| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 16:33:57 |
| Message-ID: | 5405F175.8030607@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2014 06:27 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es> wrote:
>> We are definitely worse. This is the problem, we only look to our own
>> belly bottom (if this expression exists in English). All NoSQL scale
>> *easily*, *transparently* beyond one node. Postgres doesn't. I'm not saying
>> they don't suck at many many other things, or that some of them may be worse
>> solution than the problem. But despite JSON/JSONB in pg is awesome, it's far
>> far away from what we need to compete agains NoSQL in these regards.
> So the discussion started out with a desire to improve PL/pgSQL. Now
> somehow NoSQL and JSON is discussed in the same thread. Interesting.
> Godwin's Law never fails :-)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Not to mention completely unsubstantiated claims about *all* NoSQL
scaling *easily* and *transparently* beyond one node :)
--
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2014-09-02 16:42:28 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-09-02 16:31:43 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |