From: | Joby John <jobyjc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Objects without schema |
Date: | 2018-11-30 21:14:16 |
Message-ID: | CAAHsARk1tc5C=95x_HkpJZCddjDSQZNSx3K_F6skukaSiPKPzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Ok. Thank you for the clarification.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 01:44, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 11/30/2018 02:27 AM, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/ddl-schemas.html
> > Description:
> >
> > In the last section of the document it says 'If you need to work with
> those
> > systems, then maximum portability would be achieved by not using schemas
> at
> > all.'.
> > But how do we achieve this? If I am not mistaken, all objects(like
> tables)
> > created in the database need to be created under one schema.
>
> Correct, in that every object has to have a schema, by default the "public"
> schema.
>
> I suspect what this is trying to say is that you should keep all objects
> under
> one schema, and not explicitly reference that schema; that way queries and
> DDL
> would be more portable.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Barwick
>
> --
> Ian Barwick http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-11-30 22:36:31 | Re: First SVG graphic |
Previous Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2018-11-30 17:04:06 | Re: First SVG graphic |