Re: Support logical replication of global object commands

From: Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of global object commands
Date: 2022-08-30 02:39:02
Message-ID: CAAD30UL8cr0-RfM8D1kcFBOFN9RjFEpGznkmAWPRpMr3b-4HPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I think a publication of ALL OBJECTS sounds intuitive. Does it mean we'll
> > publish all DDL commands, all commit and abort operations in every
> > database if there is such publication of ALL OBJECTS?
> >
>
> Actually, I intend something for global objects. But the main thing
> that is worrying me about this is that we don't have a clean way to
> untie global object replication from database-specific object
> replication.

I think ultimately we need a clean and efficient way to publish (and
subscribe to) any changes in all databases, preferably in one logical
replication slot.

--
Regards,
Zheng

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2022-08-30 02:42:01 Re: Postmaster self-deadlock due to PLT linkage resolution
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-08-30 02:31:47 Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types