From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of global object commands |
Date: | 2022-08-16 11:47:59 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Ljij597FfKjbBF48-vQKcfFi4kzoF5OO_0QiGrBpor5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:35 AM Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Can we think of relying to send WAL of such DDLs just based on whether
> > there is a corresponding publication (ex. publication of ALL OBJECTS)?
> > I mean avoid database-specific filtering in decoding for such DDL
> > commands but not sure how much better it is than the current proposal?
>
> I think a publication of ALL OBJECTS sounds intuitive. Does it mean we'll
> publish all DDL commands, all commit and abort operations in every
> database if there is such publication of ALL OBJECTS?
>
Actually, I intend something for global objects. But the main thing
that is worrying me about this is that we don't have a clean way to
untie global object replication from database-specific object
replication.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-08-16 11:50:05 | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-08-16 11:44:55 | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |