Re: Function scan FDW pushdown

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, solaimurugan vellaipandiyan <drsolaimurugan(dot)v(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, g(dot)kashkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function scan FDW pushdown
Date: 2026-08-24 15:12:55
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0v7Eag=LLQgGDgydnxQ9JJ=wCK+=9JAveLkKnZYdsS-Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I am raising this [1] here, in case it was missed.

The unnest function portion of the test introduced in this commit
is unstable. [1] includes a patch to fix this.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAA5RZ0uC%3DGOihOKcF7o3JVETF3e-Fkc4OUO5NbqMEKCTeSN-dQ%40mail.gmail.com

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2026-08-24 15:26:09 Re: How to best find unexpected WARNINGs in the TAP tests?
Previous Message David Rowley 2026-08-24 15:06:48 Re: Add bms_offset_members() function for bitshifting Bitmapsets