Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
Date: 2026-04-04 13:25:26
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0t6bCR6Pasd_eWqXvyUmrNDWmHUy1yN_Po-c4+b9BtBqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> WDYT?

"Scores greater than or equal to <literal>1.0</literal>" in the comments
of each field are misleading. This conflates scoring with vacuum/analyze
eligibility and it's possible with a autovacuum_*_weight < 1.0 to trigger an
autovacuum/analyze.

I suggest the attached changes on top of v9.

--
Sami

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-sami_doc_fix.patch application/octet-stream 3.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2026-04-04 13:25:40 Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Previous Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2026-04-04 13:16:58 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]