Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-06-16 10:20:57
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LmJamH6tKhCFmzdUHNEKr2ofVaGx_WQGy+1wsN+kPNhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:33 PM osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 2:13 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attached the patch-set that addressed those two comments.
>

Few minor comments:
1.
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Clustering <structname>pg_class</structname> in a transaction.

Can we change above to: Perform <command>CLUSTER</command> on
<structname>pg_class</structname> in a transaction.

2.
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Executing <command>TRUNCATE</command> on user catalog table
in a transaction.
+ </para>

Square brackets are missing for user.

3.
+ <indexterm>
+ <primary>Overview</primary>
+ </indexterm>
..
..
+ <indexterm>
+ <primary>Caveats</primary>
+ </indexterm>

Why are these required when we already have titles? I have seen other
places in the docs where we use titles for Overview and Caveats but
they didn't have similar usage.

4.
<para>
+ Performing <command>PREPARE TRANSACTION</command> after
<command>LOCK</command>
+ command on <structname>pg_class</structname> and logical
decoding of published
+ table.

Can we change above to: <command>PREPARE TRANSACTION</command> after
<command>LOCK</command> command on <structname>pg_class</structname>
and allow logical decoding of two-phase transactions.

5.
+ <para>
+ Clustering <structname>pg_trigger</structname> and decoding
<command>PREPARE
+ TRANSACTION</command>, if any published table have a trigger and any
+ operations that will be decoded are conducted.
+ </para>

Can we change above to: <command>PREPARE TRANSACTION</command> after
<command>CLUSTER</command> command on
<structname>pg_trigger</structname> and allow logical decoding of
two-phase transactions. This will lead to deadlock only when published
table have a trigger.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-06-16 10:22:46 Issue with some calls to GetMultiXactIdMembers()
Previous Message Boris Kolpackov 2021-06-16 09:48:28 Pipeline mode and PQpipelineSync()