Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2022-05-18 04:59:30
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LjOm6-OHggYVH35dQ_v40jOXrJW0GFy3kuwTd2J48=Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments, the attached v13 patch has the changes for the same.
>

Few comments on v13-0001
======================
1.
+ *
+ * FIXME: LOGICALREP_PROTO_LOCALONLY_VERSION_NUM needs to be bumped to 4 in
+ * PG16.
...
@@ -477,6 +489,12 @@ pgoutput_startup(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
OutputPluginOptions *opt,
else
ctx->twophase_opt_given = true;

+ if (data->local_only && data->protocol_version <
LOGICALREP_PROTO_LOCALONLY_VERSION_NUM)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
+ errmsg("requested proto_version=%d does not support local_only, need
%d or higher",
+ data->protocol_version, LOGICALREP_PROTO_LOCALONLY_VERSION_NUM)));

What is the need to change the protocol version for this parameter? As
per my understanding, we only need a different protocol version when
we are sending some new message or some additional information in an
existing message as we have done for the streaming/two_phase options
which doesn't seem to be the case here.

2.
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef struct PGOutputData
bool streaming;
bool messages;
bool two_phase;
+ bool local_only;
} PGOutputData;

It seems we already have a similar option named 'only_local' in
TestDecodingData which has the exactly same functionality. So, isn't
it better to name this as 'only_local' instead of 'local_only'? Also,
let's add a test case for 'only_local' option of test_decoding.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-05-18 05:12:05 Re: Valgrind mem-check for postgres extension
Previous Message Natarajan R 2022-05-18 04:43:04 Valgrind mem-check for postgres extension