Re: Do we have a CF manager for November?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we have a CF manager for November?
Date: 2019-12-01 04:02:49
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lh==VmDZ1NVCHCXsomZqzre1MaserW1yu5QvGZa8UjZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 9:23 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 04:02:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > So, we are close to the end of this commit fest, and I have done a
> > first pass on something like one third of the entries, mainly updating
> > incorrect patch status, bumping them into next CF or closing stale
> > items waiting on author.
>
> I have worked more on the CF. And here are the final results:
> Committed: 36.
> Moved to next CF: 146.
> Withdrawn: 4.
> Rejected: 6.
> Returned with Feedback: 29.
> Total: 221.
>
> The results are very comparable with the last CF, where 39 were marked
> as committed and 28 as returned with feedback. I know that we are
> still a couple of hours before officially being in December AoE
> (exactly 9), so I am a bit ahead. My apologies about that.
>
I have been able to go through each patch, and pinged each author
> where needed.

Thank you for your efforts.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-12-01 05:16:17 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:53:17 Re: Do we have a CF manager for November?