Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date: 2021-02-25 04:52:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LbYMBn2iE77huSMU6+iUaHWapSt4g5HPY+9XQ2Z1EhGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:55 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, I have pushed the fix and the latest run of 'thorntail' has passed.
> >
> > I got the following WARNING message from a logical replication apply worker:
> >
> > WARNING: relcache reference leak: relation "pg_subscription_rel" not closed
> >
> > The cause of this is that GetSubscriptionRelState() doesn't close the
> > relation in SUBREL_STATE_UNKNOWN case. It seems that commit ce0fdbfe9
> > forgot to close it. I've attached the patch to fix this issue.
> >
>
> Thanks for the report and fix. Your patch LGTM. I'll push it tomorrow.
>

Pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-25 05:21:54 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-25 04:42:15 Re: 64-bit XIDs in deleted nbtree pages