Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 6:50 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have split your top up patch into 2 - one related to the document
> > > change being the subject of this thread and the other for fixing the
> > > query. Committer may squash the patch, if they think so.
> > >
> >
> > The changes look good to me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Looks like Amit has already committed it. I had created a CF entry
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5904/ to track this. I will
> mark it as committed now.
>

Thanks.

> Amit,
> While reviewing the patches again, I felt that the second sentence in
> that section also needs a bit of clarification. Here's patch with that
> change. Please feel free to reject it or apply it.
>

The additional part: ""+ or when creating replication slots
directly" you mentioned could be considered to be added. But I see
that is already explained in the link mentioned in the doc, see [1].
So, I suggest we leave this part of docs as it is.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/logicaldecoding-explanation.html#LOGICALDECODING-REPLICATION-SLOTS-SYNCHRONIZATION

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.