Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Date: 2022-08-04 01:37:16
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LQozO4Cg0d1VPoqo4LHgcvBxhUf08e9-NVWBc++3805g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:21 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Pushed this one and now I'll look at your other patch.
>

I have pushed the second patch as well after making minor changes in
the comments. Alvaro [1] and Tom [2] suggest to back-patch this and
they sound reasonable to me. Will you be able to produce back branch
patches?

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220803104544.k2luy5hr2ugnhgr2%40alvherre.pgsql
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2966703.1659535343%40sss.pgh.pa.us

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-08-04 01:52:04 Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-08-04 01:35:46 Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage