Re: Avoid resetting subscription two_phase state to pending when already enabled

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Avoid resetting subscription two_phase state to pending when already enabled
Date: 2026-11-05 06:13:29
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LQ1Y-J_O-Yau09DaYbBh0=5Honena2xHthA9kGVw+Yeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 4, 2026 at 6:54 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 03:31:19PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > But I feel we should add that
> > change in behavior for new slot's in the commit message.
>
> +1. I think this behavior change should also be mentioned in the release notes
> for the affected branches. Is that also the intention behind adding it to the
> commit message?
>

Yes, I have pushed the patch. Thanks.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-11-05 06:41:41 Re: [PATCH v1] Fix initial sync of zero-column published tables
Previous Message surya poondla 2026-11-05 06:08:26 Re: Fix trigger memory leak