Re: comment for TwoPhaseGetOldestXidInCommit

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: comment for TwoPhaseGetOldestXidInCommit
Date: 2025-10-08 02:55:04
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LKs_wTjjGeGVc95RNOAuFEE4rnfFTLQdS7SAbMdtJgqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:56 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I noticed today that TwoPhaseGetOldestXidInCommit has a header comment
> where the same function is called TwoPhaseGetXidByLockingProc:
>
...
>
> This inconsistency should be corrected.
>

Right, I'll take care of it. Thanks for the report.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2025-10-08 00:45:37 Re: Questionable result from lead(0) IGNORE NULLS