Re: Observations in Parallel Append

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Observations in Parallel Append
Date: 2018-01-04 03:54:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LHt=QF-t6+60nzEztcSZBpZA6sowRC3ZavUYpyd+1CCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Attached, please find the patch which fixes this issue (Thanks to
>> Dilip for helping me in identifying the above case and fix). I have
>> also modified the comment atop function
>> choose_next_subplan_for_worker() as discussed above. The change to
>> remove unnecessary inclusion of spin.h is still in a separate patch as
>> posted above.
>
> Here's a combined patch with some cosmetic changes which I will commit
> if it looks OK to you.
>

Looks good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jing Wang 2018-01-04 04:20:52 Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-01-04 03:36:01 Re: Observations in Parallel Append