Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:30 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 01:49, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:08 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Pushed. I noticed that we didn't display this new subscription option
> > > 'password_required' in \dRs+:
> > >
> > > postgres=# \dRs+
> > >
> > > List of subscriptions
> > > Name | Owner | Enabled | Publication | Binary | Streaming |
> > > Two-phase commit | Disable on error | Origin | Run as Owner? |
> > > Synchronous commit | Conninfo | Skip LSN
> > >
> > > Is that intentional? Sorry, if it was discussed previously because I
> > > haven't followed this discussion in detail.
> >
> > No, I don't think that's intentional. I just didn't think about it.
>
> Here is a patch to display Password required with \dRs+ command. Also
> added one test to describe subscription when password_required is
> false, as all the existing tests were there only for password_required
> as true.
>

LGTM. Let's see if Robert or others have any comments, otherwise, I'll
push this early next week.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.