Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+

On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 6:04 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I would like to explicitly mention in the commit message that "Tag for
> > included publications was a pre-existing behavior but it is better to
> > change it for making it consistent with excluded publications tag. So,
> > how about a commit message as follows: "psql: Improve describe footer
> > titles for publications.
> >
> > The psql describe (`\d`) footer titles were previously unintuitive
> > when listing publications that included or excluded specific tables.
> > Even though the tag for included publications was pre-existing, it is
> > better to update it to "Included in publications:" to match the
> > phrasing of the "Excluded from publications:" tag.
> >
> > Footer titles for sequence and schema descriptions have been updated
> > similarly to maintain consistency."
> >
> > --
>
> OK, but the order what happened was a bit different.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.