| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished |
| Date: | 2026-09-11 12:16:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KxbxDVLWimkCvHK0caCcNW8ZK-qs-bifV4M7Q5xC3c=w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 1:36 PM Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Okay, agree. Changed as suggested.
>
> Also addressed Shveta’s comments from [1] and Amit’s off-list suggestions.
>
> Please find the updated patch attached.
>
Pushed. With this we are good to close PostgreSQL 19 open item related
to this. I'll do that early next week unless someone think otherwise.
We can continue to work on other related pre-existing issues.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2026-09-11 12:17:12 | Re: Add PRODUCT() aggregate function |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-09-11 12:02:37 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can crash a logical decoding session |