Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION
Date: 2022-11-04 04:31:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KuuPoQQFmZgAagxAkLTvevgsBY8hUiWcfrkiQMCP8wqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 9:19 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 03.11.22 01:43, Antonin Houska wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> The CF entry is about privileges on publications. Please rebase that patch
> >> and repost it so that the CF app and the CF bot are up to date.
> >
> > The rebased patch (with regression tests added) is attached here.
>
> Some preliminary discussion:
>
> What is the upgrade strategy? I suppose the options are either that
> publications have a default acl that makes them publicly accessible,
> thus preserving the existing behavior by default, or pg_dump would need
> to create additional GRANT statements when upgrading from pre-PG16.
>

I think making them publicly accessible is a better option.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2022-11-04 04:39:48 Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-11-04 04:29:43 Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION