Re: pgsql: Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:39 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks, both your patches look good to me except that we need to
> > > remove the sentence related to the revert of ade24dab97 from the
> > > commit message. I think we should backpatch the first patch to 14
> > > where it was introduced and commit the second patch (related to moving
> > > code out of critical section) only to HEAD but we can even backpatch
> > > the second one till 9.6 for the sake of consistency. What do you guys
> > > think?
> > >
> >
> > The other option could be to just commit both these patches in HEAD as
> > there is no correctness issue here.
>
> Right, even I feel we should just commit it to the HEAD as there is no
> correctness issue.
>

Thanks for your opinion. I'll commit it to the HEAD by next Tuesday
unless someone feels that we should backpatch this.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.