Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Date: 2022-02-19 05:33:29
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KXcuEtLmk0zzNvbwAF5_AdMjAeTA1GCM9YWoyTppGEuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:48 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Do we need to handle both FOR ALL TABLES and FOR ALL SEQUENCES at the
> same time? That seems like a reasonable thing people might want.
>

+1. That seems reasonable to me as well. I think the same will apply
to FOR ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA and FOR ALL SEQUENCES IN SCHEMA.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2022-02-19 05:34:36 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-19 05:32:15 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)