Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: AP <ap(at)zip(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Date: 2017-08-11 02:03:51
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KEjWvTr9voWg83hFR2d6+YFbhhdz0ftLEQ8dmuCaJF4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:11 PM, AP <ap(at)zip(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:32:29PM +1000, AP wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:41:24PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > > (On another note, I committed these patches.)
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Seconded. :)
>>
>> Now uploading data with fillfactor of 90. I'll know in 2-3 days
>> if the new patches are successful (earlier if they did not help).
>>
>> I compiled (as apt.postgresql.org does not provide the latest
>> beta3 version for stretch; only sid which has a different perl
>> version) 10~beta3~20170805.2225-1~593.git0d1f98b.
>
> Have gotten success with a dataset that failed before with ff 10.
>
> End result:
>
> mdstash=# select * from pgstathashindex('link_datum_id_idx');
> version | bucket_pages | overflow_pages | bitmap_pages | unused_pages | live_items | dead_items | free_percent
> ---------+--------------+----------------+--------------+--------------+------------+------------+------------------
> 4 | 12391325 | 5148912 | 158 | 191643 | 4560007478 | 0 | 1894.29056075982
> (1 row)
>

The free_percent calculation seems to be wrong. Can you please once
try after recent commit 0b7ba3d6474b8f58e74dba548886df3250805cdf? I
feel this should be fixed by that commit.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-11 02:05:48 Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-11 01:59:40 Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken