From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
Date: | 2017-08-11 01:59:40 |
Message-ID: | 29653.1502416780@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I don't think I can usefully contribute to this. Could someone else
>> take it?
> If nobody volunteers, you could always resolve this by reverting 1e8a850 and
> successors.
I think you're blaming the victim. Our current theory about the cause
of this is that on Windows, WaitLatchOrSocket cannot be used to wait for
completion of a nonblocking connect() call. That seems pretty broken
independently of whether libpqwalreceiver needs the capability.
In any case, we have a draft patch, so what we should be pressing for
is for somebody to test it. Peter's not in a position to do that
(and neither am I), but anyone who can build from source on Windows
could do so.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-11 02:31:01 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Previous Message | Augustine, Jobin | 2017-08-11 01:58:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-11 02:03:51 | Re: pgsql 10: hash indexes testing |
Previous Message | Augustine, Jobin | 2017-08-11 01:58:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |