Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-01-04 08:18:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KC_ZRKCMdeoWrVPtK_2=UM9715YwuVhO0sAnhqpe75jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 12:31 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 4:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > 3. Merged the doc changes patch after some changes mostly cosmetic.
> Some minor comments here:
>
> v35-0001 - logicaldecoding.sgml
>
> In the example section:
> Change "The following example shows SQL interface can be used to
> decode prepared transactions."
> to "The following example shows the SQL interface that can be used to
> decode prepared transactions."
>
> Then in "Two-phase commit support for Logical Decoding" page:
> Change "To support streaming of two-phase commands, an output plugin
> needs to provide the additional callbacks."
> to "To support streaming of two-phase commands, an output plugin needs
> to provide additional callbacks."
>
> Other than that, I have no more comments.
>

Thanks, I have pushed the 0001* patch after making the above and a few
other cosmetic modifications.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-01-04 09:08:52 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Previous Message Luc Vlaming 2021-01-04 08:04:34 Re: Consider Parallelism While Planning For REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW