Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2020-09-21 11:54:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1K5k-KDcRgdbspmO6ffwq1rrjzHO4WUJOPO4YDO7LUA5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:23 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 9:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I think we need to call ReorderBufferAbort at least to clean up the
> > TXN. Also, if what you are saying is correct then that should be true
> > without this patch as well, no? If so, we don't need to worry about it
> > as far as this patch is concerned.
>
> Yes, that is true. So will change this check to:
>
> if (TransactionIdIsValid(xid) &&
> ReorderBufferTxnIsPrepared(ctx->reorder, xid, parsed->twophase_gid)
>

Yeah and add the Assert for skip conditions as asked above.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-09-21 11:56:00 Lift line-length limit for pg_service.conf
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-09-21 11:52:25 Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init