| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment |
| Date: | 2018-10-02 05:51:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1K2prQzNUdgrv9eu6N9P-_ZOFuh_p7D3iqKPsORoHjWRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> (But it might be worth choosing slightly less
> >> generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests
> >> later in that script.)
>
> > The function name and statement name seems okay to me. How about
> > changing the table name to fooarr or arrtest?
>
> Up to you.
>
Okay, I have pushed the test case patch on HEAD. Attached is the
code-fix patch, let's wait for a day so that we have all the results
which can help us to discuss the merits of this patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix_datum_serialization_v4.patch | application/octet-stream | 720 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-02 06:10:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-10-02 05:50:26 | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) |