Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Date: 2018-10-02 04:37:49
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (But it might be worth choosing slightly less
>> generic object names, to avoid a conflict against other sub-tests
>> later in that script.)

> The function name and statement name seems okay to me. How about
> changing the table name to fooarr or arrtest?

Up to you.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 04:42:54 Re: [PATCH] Add missing type conversion functions for PL/Python
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-02 04:35:45 Re: [WIP PATCH] Index scan offset optimisation using visibility map