From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Date: | 2016-03-15 14:25:49 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JtdsbYrcb-fqkGWiFgqp5D9B=1Fj6pcLWLHM_yaOuvYA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:54 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/16 1:17 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:00 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> >
> >> This patch no longer applies cleanly:
> >>
> >> $ git apply ../other/group_update_clog_v6.patch
> >> error: patch failed: src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c:404
> >> error: src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c: patch does not apply
> >> error: patch failed: src/include/storage/proc.h:152
> >> error: src/include/storage/proc.h: patch does not apply
> >
> > For me, with patch -p1 < <path_of_patch> it works, but any how I have
> > updated the patch based on recent commit. Can you please check the
> > latest patch and see if it applies cleanly for you now.
>
> Yes, it now applies cleanly (101fd93).
>
Thanks for verification.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2016-03-15 14:28:29 | Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2016-03-15 14:24:19 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |