From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enabling parallelism for queries coming from SQL or other PL functions |
Date: | 2017-03-02 10:24:38 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Jt0EXNaz_+38FV0hPG53mz2jNZ3gtNCgnd2KJw8Ydj=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> When such a function (that contains statements which have parallel
>> plans) is being executed as part of another parallel plan, it can
>> allow spawning workers unboundedly. Assume a query like select *
>> from t1 where c1 < func1(), this can use parallel scan for t1 and
>> then in master backend, during partial scan of t1, it can again spawn
>> new set of workers for queries inside func1(), this can happen
>> multiple times if parallel query inside func1() again calls some other
>> function func2() which has parallel query. Now, this might be okay,
>> but today such a situation doesn't exist that Gather execution can
>> invoke another Gather node, so it is worth to consider if we want to
>> allow it.
>
> If we want to prohibit that, the check in standard_planner can be
> changed from !IsParallelWorker() to !IsInParallelMode(), but I'm not
> 100% sure whether that's an improvement or not.
>
I am not sure how you can achieve that by just changing
standard_planner() code, because the plans of statements inside pl can
be cached in which case it will not try to regenerate the plan.
> I would be inclined
> to leave it alone unless we get several votes to change it.
>
Okay, not a problem.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-03-02 10:50:15 | Re: [pgsql-www] Small issue in online devel documentation build |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-03-02 10:22:35 | Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode |