From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Date: | 2021-11-26 03:32:19 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Je5kfXzUAtN3_=gqAiuFbBw2pwFUi72_nKxx8148TzJg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 7:39 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021, at 10:39 AM, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>
> When researching and writing a top-up patch about this.
> I found a possible issue which I'd like to confirm first.
>
> It's possible the table is published in two publications A and B, publication A
> only publish "insert" , publication B publish "update". When UPDATE, both row
> filter in A and B will be executed. Is this behavior expected?
>
> Good question. No. The code should check the action before combining the
> multiple row filters.
>
Do you mean to say that we should give an error on Update/Delete if
any of the publications contain table rowfilter that has columns that
are not part of the primary key or replica identity? I think this is
what Hou-san has implemented in his top-up patch and I also think this
is the right behavior.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | torikoshia | 2021-11-26 03:39:48 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-11-26 03:08:44 | Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid |