Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid
Date: 2021-11-26 03:08:44
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+YCpOb-Oe1k_xpinGWOamCgAkfdM9PrixAbXeqvYdShw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 25, 2021 4:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:30 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > >
> > > I agree with backpatching the doc fix. I've attached a diff against
> > > master, though it also appears to apply to 13 and 14 branches.
> > >
> >
> > I think we can <literal></literal> for publish_via_partition_root, other than that
> > the patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Hou-San, others, do you have any opinion about this patch and whether to
> > backpatch it or not?
>
> I think it makes sense to backpatch the doc fix, and the patch looks good to me.
>

Thanks, I'll push this sometime early next week unless there are any
objections to it.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-11-26 03:32:19 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-11-26 02:56:48 Re: pg_upgrade and publication/subscription problem