From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) |
Date: | 2017-05-26 02:19:35 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JMHh_06gk5GFRkL2RYivwPAsS85zuvqOmG86MeOxFR1g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, I also share this opinion, the shm attach failures are due to
>> randomization behavior, so sleep won't help much. So, I will change
>> the patch to use 100 retries unless people have other opinions.
>
> Sounds about right to me.
>
Okay. I have changed the retry count to 100 and modified few comments
in the attached patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
win_shm_retry_reattach_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-26 02:45:09 | Re: pg_dump ignoring information_schema tables which used in Create Publication. |
Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2017-05-26 00:00:07 | Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) |