Re: Parallel copy

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Date: 2020-02-19 13:04:46
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JF2TgZ6qbfg2tqEpcVC+C6rBGpk1fAKNeHc8GTPOH=oQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The one piece of information I'm missing here is at least a very rough
> quantification of the individual steps of CSV processing - for example
> if parsing takes only 10% of the time, it's pretty pointless to start by
> parallelising this part and we should focus on the rest. If it's 50% it
> might be a different story.
>

Right, this is important information to know.

> Has anyone done any measurements?
>

Not yet, but planning to work on it.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-02-19 13:16:09 Re: Increase psql's password buffer size
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-02-19 12:51:32 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side