From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel copy |
Date: | 2020-02-19 13:04:46 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JF2TgZ6qbfg2tqEpcVC+C6rBGpk1fAKNeHc8GTPOH=oQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:08 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The one piece of information I'm missing here is at least a very rough
> quantification of the individual steps of CSV processing - for example
> if parsing takes only 10% of the time, it's pretty pointless to start by
> parallelising this part and we should focus on the rest. If it's 50% it
> might be a different story.
>
Right, this is important information to know.
> Has anyone done any measurements?
>
Not yet, but planning to work on it.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-02-19 13:16:09 | Re: Increase psql's password buffer size |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-02-19 12:51:32 | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side |