Re: pageinspect and hash indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pageinspect and hash indexes
Date: 2017-03-24 07:54:59
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JCjogGzTy=WFdxipZXfogYWPf-jui5wnzb9H0T0SV1bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing my patch. I have removed the extra white space.
>> Attached are both the patches.
>
> Sorry, I have mistakenly attached wrong patch. Here are the correct
> set of patches.
>

The latest version of patches looks fine to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-03-24 08:27:03 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-03-24 07:53:01 Re: Parallel Append implementation