Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Date: 2017-03-24 08:27:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ashutosh,

On 2017/03/23 21:48, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> I have fixed all the issues reported till now.

In patch 0007, the following code in have_partkey_equi_join() looks
potentially unsafe:

* If the clause refers to different partition keys from
* both relations, it can not be used for partition-wise join.
if (ipk1 != ipk2)

* The clause allows partition-wise join if only it uses the same
* operator family as that specified by the partition key.
if (!list_member_oid(rinfo->mergeopfamilies,

What if ipk1 and ipk2 both turn out to be -1? Accessing
part_schem->partopfamily[ipk1] would be incorrect, no?


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-03-24 08:47:50 Re: BUG: pg_dump generates corrupted gzip file in Windows
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-03-24 07:54:59 Re: pageinspect and hash indexes