| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Hitting CheckRelationLockedByMe() ASSERT with force_generic_plan |
| Date: | 2018-12-14 11:13:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J6dCfRE-hJXJbnBwy75_4wFJaWQmTUgunArJTytu7d0w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:32 AM Rushabh Lathia
<rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While looking code further around this, I realized that we need
> similar kind of fix for bitmap as well as index only scan as well.
>
I think if we want to move forward with this patch, we need to first
investigate the deadlock hazard mentioned by Tom in other related
thread [1]. I and others have also responded on that thread, see if
you can respond to it.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3046.1542990312%40sss.pgh.pa.us
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-12-14 11:41:36 | explain plans with information about (modified) gucs |
| Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2018-12-14 09:23:09 | Re: Making WAL receiver startup rely on GUC context for primary_conninfo and primary_slot_name |