Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Date: 2025-09-08 07:13:04
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J4kmX5oWHAXiWP9deKK8qcJDXZb4LagofeaN0hfn2k_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 5:03 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here are v2 patches which addressed above comments.
>

I have pushed the first patch. I find that the test can't reliably
fail without a fix. Can you please investigate it?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2025-09-08 07:20:40 Re: Add xicorr(X, Y): support for the xi (ξ) correlation coefficient by Chatterjee
Previous Message David Geier 2025-09-08 07:11:24 Re: Use merge-based matching for MCVs in eqjoinsel