| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bert <biertie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Date: | 2015-11-22 06:25:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+zZmZcndxoHDBZjukRPNc7eQ7HZepgwnALF-TqA7St3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > Isn't it better to destroy the memory for readers array as that gets
> > allocated
> > even if there are no workers available for execution?
> >
> > Attached patch fixes the issue by just destroying readers array.
>
> Well, then you're making ExecGatherShutdownWorkers() not a no-op any
> more. I'll go commit a combination of your two patches.
>
Thanks!
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2015-11-22 10:20:23 | Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-22 05:47:35 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] latest buildfarm client release |